Ls-land.issue.19-911.08 [exclusive] <LIMITED>

[Insert current status, e.g., open, in progress, resolved]

Coastal argues that IRA cannot produce evidence that the registered owner (or its predecessors) had actual knowledge of the adverse claim prior to 2000. IRA submits deposition testimony from a former owner’s grandson who recalls seeing “fishermen walk across the lawn.” That testimony is hearsay and insufficient under Land Court Rule 56(e). No written permission was ever granted; but also no written objection. Under Ivons-Nispel v. Sandland , 487 Mass. 396 (2021), “mere sufferance” of occasional recreational transit does not establish prescription. ls-land.issue.19-911.08

Please provide more context, and I'll do my best to help you craft a clear and effective post! [Insert current status, e